One of the considerations that often pops up is implied volatility, particularly in reference to historic volatility. At this point, I am assuming some basic familiarity with options and the different parameters (delta, theta, etc.) affecting the price. I wrote this little bit below over a year ago but it still holds true and illustrates the concept of IV implosion quite well. The specific date of the event noted below escapes me at this point but it is nearly irrelevant anyway.
=================================================================================AMLN watchers had been anticipating exenatide LAR results for a long time and consequently had driven IV up to around 80 (maybe higher), in turn inflating the value of both calls and puts. When the data was finally released on Wednesday morning, the stock tumbled about 3%. Obviously, the call options would be affected. But look at this chart:
The puts lost nearly 50% of their value also, even as they went in the money. Of course, there's a lot more math involved but this is the best illustration of just how IV implosion works when it comes to highly anticipated events like data release in biotech and earnings calls.
The puts lost nearly 50% of their value also, even as they went in the money. Of course, there's a lot more math involved but this is the best illustration of just how IV implosion works when it comes to highly anticipated events like data release in biotech and earnings calls.
Unfortunately, I can't remember what day this was so I can't find the share pricing graph to match up with the options pricing. But as stated before, it's largely irrelevant to the illustration.
0 comments:
Post a Comment